Jury Selection for the Defense of a Legal Malpractice Case
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.35 (517 Votes) |
| Asin | : | B00B2F9YCM |
| Format Type | : | |
| Number of Pages | : | 334 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2013-04-15 |
| Language | : | English |
DESCRIPTION:
Two Stars AWM Not very deep in material and not very helpful. Any lawyer should know all of this already.
These differences will also be explored below. The former definition more accurately states your objective in jury selection because, to the extent possible, you must plan your questioning to uncover accurate and honest answers from the jury panel. t At some point in time, most of these would-be jurors who do possess a strong opinion about lawyers or the legal profession will speak up-or so you hope. The term “voir dire” has its roots in the latin phrase “venum dicere”, which translates to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both. In the same fashion, while the majority of legal malpractice cases are venued in state courts, a case in federal court presents challenging jury selection issues which will be discussed in this chapter.. Authored by David Larson, Attorn